Talk:Hugh D'Amberville

From DQWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Didn't want to just delete without discussion so...

Suggest this article for deletion:

  • This information is a direct duplicate of the listing for the Baron on the Newcastle page
  • The Baron is not a figure of great influence outside of his Barony.

Following the their own page or a sub-section guideline he is correctly listed under Newcastle.

The only purpose of this independant page seem to be that of adding him to a category... and I'm not sure of its worth.

Martin Dickson 11:20, 9 May 2006 (NZST)


I thought the category is worthwhile, at least once it is populated. While the article is identical at the moment, I hope it will flesh out a bit over the coming months/years :-)

Happy to remove if people feel it is unnessesary.

Mandos 12:37, 9 May 2006 (NZST)


The category tag could be added to the Newcastle page if that is where the barons details are.

The idea behind the guideline is to keep info together with related info as much as possible. If the Baron has minimal impact on the world outside of his barony then there is no point in him having his own page.

His evil sister (in law?) had most of her impact on the world outside of Newcourt so it could be argued that she should get her own page. But then she is (reportedly) dead so perhaps a footnote in the ruling family section the Newcourt page is appropriate.

[Sister. And yes, reportedly dead (twice). And she appears in a footnote on the Newcastle page. - Martin Dickson]

May I suggest the Print test - how quickly and easily can you print the information you need? How many different pages do you need to find and print to get everything you need?

How often would you want to print out the details of Baron Hugh without the details of Newcourt to accompany it? And how often would you want to print the Newcourt details without the Baron?

Stephen 14:06, 9 May 2006 (NZST)