<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
	<id>https://dq-nz.org/dqwiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ABestiary_Index</id>
	<title>Talk:Bestiary Index - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://dq-nz.org/dqwiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ABestiary_Index"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dq-nz.org/dqwiki/index.php?title=Talk:Bestiary_Index&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-01T10:23:33Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.41.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://dq-nz.org/dqwiki/index.php?title=Talk:Bestiary_Index&amp;diff=44792&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>ErrolC: Please retain for now</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dq-nz.org/dqwiki/index.php?title=Talk:Bestiary_Index&amp;diff=44792&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2007-10-23T11:23:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Please retain for now&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Links done to old Bestiary layout on Dec 11. Changes since are to match GM Guide 2005 layout. --[[User:ErrolC|Errol]] 20:22, 19 Dec 2006 (NZDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I&amp;#039;m beginning to wonder if we need a new category for the really wierd stuff ... such as what D&amp;amp;D call abberrants&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Also .. if anyone has any other creatures they would like to share, please add them. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Keith|Keith]] 15:44, 1 May 2007 (NZST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Can you give some more examples of these &amp;#039;Abberrants&amp;#039; please?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Keith&amp;#039;s second point, I think we should limit the number of mundane creatures included. They tend to clutter up what is already a long list, and add little to the game IMO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:ErrolC|Errol]] 15:58, 1 May 2007 (NZST)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was thinking of creatures like oozes, and any other real oddballs. Currently I&amp;#039;m looking at manavores for my game.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Keith|Keith]] 16:02, 1 May 2007 (NZST)&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
My feeling is that the bestiary is the list of known / shared creatures, which then represents potentially &amp;quot;knowable&amp;quot; knowledge by characters. Every GM has their own weird oddities. If we put them in the Wiki, I&amp;#039;d like to see them not integrated with the rest of the bestiary, as many of them are only suited for certain styles of campaigns. In particular, I think creatures that only occur off-plane should not be in the Bestiary, except perhaps for the few fully shared off-plane spaces - i.e. Hell, and maybe the 4 elemental planes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On the other hand, a place for GMs to be inspired by other GMs writeups isn&amp;#039;t a bad idea. If I want to use a manavore as a GM, I could look at Keith&amp;#039;s writeup, or Gordon&amp;#039;s, or William&amp;#039;s, or anyone else whose used them.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Have a look at what William&amp;#039;s done with the Calamar, documenting them reasonably fully, but not integrating them into the bestiary. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Andreww|Andreww]] 13:52, 3 May 2007 (NZST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
We possibly don&amp;#039;t need this page once the individual creature pages are set up (and the index is provided by the Bestiary Category), but I might convert it to a Table of Contents, so please leave so I can have the wikicode as a start point. --[[User:ErrolC|Errol]] 00:23, 24 Oct 2007 (NZDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>ErrolC</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>